So I've been percolating on the idea of starting a #livinginthetension series.
Today seems like a good day to start.
I love the irony and the tensions we live in without knowing.
There's no stones being thrown here. I'm right in the mess with the rest of you so lets poke a little fun at our inconsistencies. Most of these will be an inspiration from my own life anyways like the good ol Entrepreneur!
Friday, April 26, 2013
Monday, April 15, 2013
Assumptions that Affect Our Lives
The book Assumptions that Affect our Lives
(Overman, 2006) highlights how different worldviews essentially determine
the values and behaviors that shape and influence culture or counter-cultural
currents. The intended outcomes of this
book are to leave the reader with the ability to identify the plethora of
non-biblical concepts that have become embedded into our current day way of
life, along with the tools needed to adequately respond to those who have
embrace them (Overman, 2006, p. 9). The book begins with a fascinating historical
comparison of Greek and Hebrew culture along with how those traditions have
continued to influence our cultural assumptions in present times.
There is a great discussion in the book about the confusion
between God and Mother Nature considering most people assume Nature “is the source of Its own creative power, as
though It were some sort of immense perpetual motion machine that just created
Itself (intelligently, no less) and keeps going on Its own”(Overman, 2006, p. 25). The Ionians, a group of Greeks who lived over
2,500 years ushered in a whole new way of thinking that undermined the belief
that nature was something God created.
“What is so remarkable about the Ionians is, as far as we know, they
were the first people in history to dismiss the supernatural altogether”
(Overman, 2006, p. 27).
While everyone else was paying homage to a creator of some kind,
the Ionians were ushering in secular thought, still prevalent today that says,
there is no such thing as God, nature is all that existed and it essentially
created itself. This also inspired the
drive and elevation of the development of the Sciences, which exclude
faith. Clearly this would be in direct
conflict with the Hebrew ways of thinking that see nature and science as
something that exists within the framework of a God that created the world and
the life that inhabits it.
Overman (2006) also highlighted the strong difference regarding
human life in Sparta and Athens at a certain point in history where we find
“these concepts the Athenian exaltation of individualism, and the Spartan
exaltation of collectivism – has never died” (p. 41). A more recent modern example of how these
concepts have continued to influence our worldview and values can be found in
the United States 2012 presidential race where “on one side is the collective
view (represented by President Barak Obama), and on the other, the idea that
individual succeeds on his or her own (promoted by Mitt Romney)” (Michaud, 2012, para. 1).
The challenge humanity has always faced is to institute the best
systems to manage broken people. Whether
it is democracy, socialism, capitalism, communism or the other attempts found over
time, we have seen that all systems carry not only their own flaws but also the
flaws of those who manage them. The
challenge for Christians across the globe is to seek out ways to live that are
consistent with the Kingdom of God and in doing so we have to ask Him to what
degrees collectivism and individualism can co-exist. We are living in the tension of a God who
died for the individual yet is coming back for a body of believers.
This has been a great book to remind me just how much of my
current day beliefs are influenced by history. How I should live and respond to those who are operating within the
boundaries of beliefs that are inherently harmful to them? Further I sense the need to dive deeper into
the past to identify the beliefs that are hindering me personally from living
out Kingdom principles here on earth.
God chose the Jews to tell His story to the world, which makes me wonder
whether their traditions and values carry some special insight into His heart
for all peoples?
References
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Seven Pillars of Servant Leadership
By Robert Murray.
The book Seven Pillars of Servant
Leadership (Sipe & Frick, 2009)
was written to help enhance the education of leaders seeking to further
implement servant-leader principles. The
authors felt it necessary to convert “the characteristics of Servant Leadership
into sustainable, measurable competencies, without neglecting matters of the
heart and soul, which make leading by serving truly worthwhile” (Sipe &
Frick, 2009- Kindle Locations 88-89).
The book explores seven pillars of a servant-leader, which are: Person
of Character; Puts people first; Skilled Communicator; Compassionate
Collaborator; Foresight; Systems thinker; Moral Authority.
A foundational pillar of a
servant-leader is someone of strong character who maintains a life of
integrity, demonstrating their humility by serving and elevating God in all that
they do. Sipe and Frick (2009) suggest
that many of our defining moments that build character happen in private and
their effects may never be witnessed by anyone else, but those decisions
none-the-less become
a point of contact that will be ingrained into the fabric of our being (Kindle
Location 332). Integrity is one of the
most powerful tests of true character and servant-leadership.
Servant-leaders understand there are always going to be
those “gray” opportunities in business they will have to forfeit in order to uphold
their integrity and these decisions will come at a cost to them but they know
“it is always right to do what’s right, even if it turns out wrong”(McManus, 2002, p. 67). We live in a world where so many people take shortcuts
that lack integrity, hurting others directly and indirectly but the Bible
encourages us in Psalm 37:1-2, “Do not fret because of those
who are evil
or be envious of those who do
wrong; for like the grass they will soon wither,
like green plants they will soon die away.”
“Foresight is a practical
strategy for making decisions and leading. In fact, Greenleaf said foresight is the only
"lead" a leader has (Sipe & Frick, 2009 - Kindle
Location 1235). A Servant-Leader
understands that foresight is central to their leadership capabilities and they
therefore give credit to their intuition which will allow them to be more
discerning and decisive in their decision making process.
The logical way for planning is
to analyze the present and project it into the future or to project several
alternate scenarios, but these straight-line projections are very rarely played
out in reality. “Robert Greenleaf, goes
beyond these mostly-analytical tools, taking advantage of resources in the
head, heart, and gut to access the intuitive mind (Sipe & Frick,
2009 - Kindle Location 1288-1289). I
believe God has hard wired us to operate in dimensions beyond those we can
touch, taste and see. There is a
“knowing” that can be accessed by Servant-Leaders if they make the time and
space in this loud, busy world to access their intuition and what I believe to
be the voice of God being whispered through the Spirit.
This book was a joy to read and
has solidified my desire to grow and give myself to the development of these
servant-leader principles. I have already
pursued to live a life of integrity for sometime now but I am reminded that
there is always the opportunity to shine a light on the dark places of our
hearts to further our quest for righteousness.
I also realize that I have failed to give credit to my “gut” in many
situations where logic seemed more fitting.
To become a man who lives by the Spirit I will obviously need to give
more credit to the sensing’s I cannot see nor touch.
References
References
Friday, December 7, 2012
God, Work, People & The Church
I recently compiled a motion graphic slideshow designed to open up the conversations around God, work, people, and the church. My goal was to present the connection between faith and work in an understandable way.
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Replacing Control and Compliance with Stewardship
By Robert Murray
The book Stewardship (1993) challenges organizations and
individuals to consider new ways to approach the distribution of power, purpose
and rewards within the workplace. Typical work environments, institutions and
systems rely on heavy-handed control and/or compliance to operate but this book
sets out to “quicken our efforts to reform our organizations so that our
democracy thrives, our spirit is answered, and our ability to serve customers
in the broadest sense is guaranteed”
(Block, 1993, p. 3).
Leadership is replaced with stewardship, patriarchy
with partnership, safety with adventure and self-interest with service.
It is easy to embrace “victim” status within our work
environments. You do not have to look
far to hear about someone complaining about his or her inadequate boss or the horrible
company they work for. By believing that
change starts within ourselves, the question therefore becomes “how many people
do you know, including yourself, who are willing to consider that their way of
relating could be the root of the problems about which they complain” (Watson & Tocchini, 1996, p. 37)?
To rise above victim living, we should revisit the expectation employees have whereby all vision,
direction and next steps have to be handed down from leaders above. Instead the exciting and empowering
opportunity exists where we can “create in our own unit what we would like to
see embodied in the whole organization” (Block, 1993, p. 37).
Bakke, Hendricks, &
Smith (2005) stressed that because of the Fall, most people do not know
what their giftedness is and “have only a vague awareness of what their real
contribution can be” (p. 59). It is no wonder the workplace is filled with
people who have no idea how to expand beyond the orders they are given. Block (1993) further addresses this issue
when he said, “patriarchy becomes a refuge for our own reluctance to choose
adventure and pursue our own purpose” (p. 89).
There is a great conversation to have about breaking the
pattern of unstated emotional wants in the workplace. “The institution wanted compliance and
loyalty, and in return we wanted them to provide us with safety and
self-esteem” (Block, 1993, p. 82). This is an unhealthy social contract, which
need some serious reform. The first step
forward will be the simple acknowledgement that these unstated emotional wants even
exist and have power over our workplace activities.
I have been made aware of the subconscious contracts I have made with employers to trade my loyalty and compliance in exchange for safety and self-esteem. These deals have to go! The
only way we can be a part of creating something of value in any work
environment, enduring the risk, sacrifice and adversity is to “commit to
something outside of ourselves”
(Block, 1993, p. 10). Colossians
3:23-24 says “whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for
the Lord, not for human masters, since you know that you will receive an
inheritance from the Lord as a reward.
It is the Lord Christ you are serving”.
References
Bakke, Hendricks, & Smith (2005) - Joy at Work Bible Study
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




